You're building with Cursor, Claude Code, or Codex. The agents are capable. The plans you're feeding them aren't. Vague prompts produce inconsistent code, rework cycles, and features that don't fit the existing architecture.
Tekk.coach is AI project planning built for developers — not PMs, not project managers. It reads your codebase before planning, generates specs with file references and acceptance criteria, and produces the precision input your coding agents need to execute correctly the first time.
[Try Tekk.coach Free →]
Why AI project planning for developers is different
Most planning tools are built for project managers: they produce milestone timelines, stakeholder deliverables, and Gantt-style task lists. None of that is the input a coding agent needs. Developer-focused planning works at the level of the code itself — subtasks described as behavioral slices ("a user can now reset their password"), each tied to specific files, acceptance criteria the agent can verify, and dependencies that determine execution order. The unit of output is a spec, not a schedule. That distinction is what separates a plan an engineer can hand to Cursor from a plan that has to be translated into engineering terms before anyone can use it.
Why codebase grounding changes the output
An AI that hasn't read your repository plans against a hypothetical version of your project. It doesn't know you use Drizzle instead of Prisma, that your auth middleware lives in a non-standard location, or that a partial implementation already exists in a branch. So it invents: packages you don't have, functions you never wrote, patterns your stack doesn't use. Tekk indexes your repo first — semantic search, file and regex search, directory browsing, and framework detection — so every subtask references files that actually exist. When the plan reflects reality, the agent executing it produces code that fits the system instead of code that works in isolation and triggers rework.
Planning that survives handoff to execution
A spec is only useful if it persists. Tekk plans live in an editable document and become cards on a kanban board, with each card linked back to the full planning session and its codebase context. For solo builders that means one source of truth instead of a chat history that scrolls away; for small teams (1–10 people) it means context doesn't fracture across threads, markdown files, and issue-tracker descriptions. You describe a feature, get a grounded spec, edit it where needed, then hand it to your coding agent of choice — the same workflow whether you ship alone or with a team.
Ready to Try Tekk.coach?
Your coding agents are capable. The plans you're feeding them aren't. Connect your repo, describe a feature, and see what a codebase-grounded spec actually looks like — and what your agents produce when the input is right.
[Start Planning Free →]